David, On Sunday, 2012-04-15 21:14:04 -0700, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: > On Apr 15, 2012, at 9:05 PM, Paul Vixie wrote: > > if you don't want something to live forever and get turned on by > > default or left on across sysadmin churn, don't put it in an RFC. > > Weren't we talking about requiring an explicit lifetime on NTAs? I'd > be all for "SHOULDs"/"MUSTs" that increase the touch factor to ensure > people pull NTAs instead of letting them ossify.
That is my suggestion, yes, for just the problems that Paul identifies, as well as any other staleness that might ensue. -- Shane _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
