[ Apologies all - I initially sent this with no subject line. Resending. Hopefully this makes things clearer... Also, unless we hear strong objections I'm planning on doing what Patrik and Matthijs suggested, option A ]
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > Hi there all, > > At the moment this document says that the child SHOULD remove the > CDS/CDNSKEY record once the parent has consumed / acted on it (this > behavior was requested by someone -- unfortunately I cannot remember > whom). > > I *think* that I'm hearing that folk would prefer that the child > SHOULD leave it in, or, less strongly MAY remove it. > > This (IMO) makes the doc and the child's life simpler, but potentially > makes a bit more work for the parent -- currently most of the > time the parent will see no CDS, and so will go back to sleep. If the > child leaves them around, the parent will need to check them against > what is currently published and take action if they differ. > > Can folk please let us know if they would prefer: > A: The child SHOULD remove the CDS/CDNSKEY RR from the zone once the > parent has published it (currently documented behavior) or > > B: The child SHOULD NOT remove the CDS/CDNSKEY RR (will require a > small edit to the doc) > > My personal preference is for B - it seems more elegant, but (as > always) we'll do whatever the WG wants. > > W > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
