Tim Wicinski writes: > The WG has several documents that we need to spend time in Dallas moving > towards completion. But we also believe the RFC 6761 drafts should not > be given short shrift. > > Accordingly, we are tentatively planning a Virtual Interim Meeting to > dive a little deeper on the special names drafts, including possible > architectural implications of the apparent increase in interest in RFC > 6761, as we attempt to muddle through the questions we’ve seen and the > ones we anticipate. >
Following this discussion from a distance, I cannot help wondering whether this is special names stuff might in violate RFC 2860 section 4.3. jaap _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop