Ted Lemon writes:
> On Mar 18, 2015, at 7:01 AM, Jaap Akkerhuis <j...@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
> > Following this discussion from a distance, I cannot help wondering
> > whether this is special names stuff might in violate RFC 2860 section 4.3.
>
> I don't see it. It looks like 2860 explicitly supports what is being
> proposed here. Where do you see a conflict?
>
Just calling something technical doesn't make it so. But that is not
my point. I was just responding on the message about the interim
stating
"we attempt to muddle through the questions we've seen and the
ones we anticipate"
I hadn't seen any questions about the relation towards RFC 2860 so
given the proposed special meeting, this is something that could be
discussed.
The pointer from Suzanne to the liaison statement shows that
apparently this as been attended to in the past.
jaap
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
