On 29 Apr 2015, at 21:36, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > On Apr 29, 2015, at 1:26 PM, Jaap Akkerhuis <j...@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: >> >> Paul Hoffman writes: >> >>> "Country" is a term of art in politics. There are definitions that most >>> people agree to, at least when it suits them. >> >> RFC 1591 purposely does not define what a country is. ISO 3166-1 >> contains a definition what constitutes a country. > > Exactly. Note that even though 1591 doesn't define "country", Jon used > "country TLDs" and "country domains" and "country code" throughout. > > --Paul Hoffman
To which I reply: Yup, but at the point RFC1951 came out no-one .ps was still to be approved. This is a rat-hole, but I'd be more comfortable if it said "country/territory". [also, .je, .im, and so on] Oddly enough, the Wiki page for ccTLDs looks OK-ish at first blush, to these reumy eyes at least. IMHO, [though NOT for all those cute videos] Sponsored TLDs are worth putting in if you're going to put in gTLD and ccTLD. all the best, Lawrence _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
