> Le 2015-05-01 à 14:47, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> a écrit : > > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:31:11AM +0200, > Patrik Fältström <p...@frobbit.se> wrote > a message of 189 lines which said: > >> Suggested new text: >> >> ccTLD -- A TLD that is allocated to distinct economies. >> Historically, these were two-letter TLDs, and were allocated to >> economies using the two letter code for the economy taken from the >> ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 standard [ISO3166] although exceptions exists. In >> recent years, there have been allocations of TLDs that conform to >> IDNA2008 ([RFC5890], [RFC5891], [RFC5892], [RFC5893], and >> [RFC5894]); these are still treated as ccTLDs for policy purposes. > > There is a risk that the very long discussion about what is a country > distracts us from an important point I would like to be added in the > definition: > >> From the point of view of the DNS, there is no difference between a > ccTLD and a gTLD. This distinction is relevant only for policies.
right. I completly agree and I was going to write almost the same thing. suggest to remove ccTLD/gTLD and stick with TLD. Marc. > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
