On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 09:50:09PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote: > Less flippantly, it is in this email: > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg13004.html I > don't think that we have a really good motivation for a week, other > than that is feels sort of like a good, human scale timeframe to > recheck on things. We really want there to be a limit on the lifetime, > a week felt right...
Yep, that's pretty much it, right there. A day isn't enough (we had feedback from customers to this effect) but anything longer than a week strikes me as much too likely to fall off operators' radar. Though the limit is arbitrary, I do believe that we need to assert *some* limit, on this approximate time scale. > but, I still like "because Evan said so..." Yes let's definitely document it that way. "... MUST NOT exceed a week, due to the whimsical and capricious nature of Evan. Pray he does not alter the deal any further." -- Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
