-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 09/21/2015 11:50 AM, Edward Lewis wrote: > > I think defining -whether- name.onion is a Domain Name will make us > re-think how Domain Names interoperate amongst protocols beyond the DN S. >
Agreed, but why limit to .onion? Can your example stretch to include .bit, .i2p, .gnu, .zkey, and why not .exit? In a recent private conversation it was suggested that as long as a domain cannot sell subdomains it could be interesting to consider (without affecting ICANN domain-name business). Earlier we've been discussing P2PNames and came to the conclusion that the term TLD should not be employed outside the DNS context, so I welcome your draft to clarify this aspect. Regards, == hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWAGo9XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9iGIQAJClr7YvbUsiO5JmcJaThpJO pjyA3AzY/+iuasj8zO/gXPHd+4wkROkvIRaT3y7A0+d02H5nE3BkeMbqeQNMsYXN XE95DBqpqH9IEUkdAGtKCHQ4z8wrwVT4Lv1fPjhUiX7LnsdH7Y65Ujchasxt/Cd0 DY4SmN4q6BErsBXSLwsLoIpK3IhvDBkIAD6EqMA+6UvoNWx4rPt0ZfmD7j4KyWSV gIsLweoaQRJCZvdjroxt/CVOfEuybdrOlfmFsnpWiwZ7lVmldJ7yL9Yl1Ps3IbTd 9ikU3brsGrT2ZzpyQRhL39vSCB81bU/e2l1t66igoOKNZBh2JViEboGXcs6DQ3oj kNc6BAEAKL5onCHFHMQdEs66OytQ+mJrStoqHHJACbLL104emeFGpl1H4G92cRG4 mXdI03ctJTCbzOFYgPcYwnsOUFzUiB8wpnSmc6KDOyI1azQIh31IGo19sx78UG9z HSzUtJt65WJ3L+Hp7853Ma6id3KUVkNyrvCgXKKz6nztuNy0CnSjVOlXXMB/ecvF EOWVh9216gNdUZRg0MRGpb4FYkH6M6V8sL0ADEi+EXebKqWzVUUO7+/DDeLaqBLI UNUbtw17LZcZ4/d0eLGM1EJYAgnrUl1aPyiWqRCjcT28AggBdWfqd+tjArFbVRa2 OnPBACcyGruzljwAWHTW =tJJg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
