Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do we know of any implementations that have tried this?
I mentioned in another message that I did a brief survey of validators. I was trying to see if there was one I could easily adapt to concurrent queries. Sadly I couldn't find one. A lot of validators are coupled to iterative resolvers, which don't have the same opportunity for fast concurrent validation that stub resolvers have. I don't know of any existing validators thet make concurrent queries. I think this is why validation has a reputation for being slow. The problem is with the implementations, not with the protocol. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Wight, Portland, Plymouth: Southwest 5 to 7, decreasing mainly 4 later. Moderate, occasionally rough in Portland and Plymouth. Drizzle at times. Moderate or good, occasionally poor. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
