> On Nov 23, 2015, at 8:07 AM, Mukund Sivaraman <m...@isc.org> wrote: > > It seems that AXFR messages would have to be sent in order to avoid > confusion at the client about when a transfer correctly completed > vs. when it timed out. While they can be multiplexed with other DNS > messages, the individual messages of a single transfer must not be sent > out of order. > > Similarly, describe IXFR too.
Hi Mukund, The document authors have discussed this and we feel the addition of this paragraph in section 7 addresses the issue that you've raised: Note that AXFR [RFC5936] and IXFR [RFC1995] have the property that one query message might result in multiple response messages. Therefore, those protocols have their own specific ordering requirements. Look reasonable? DW _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
