Hi Duane On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 07:42:16PM +0000, Wessels, Duane wrote: > The document authors have discussed this and we feel the addition of this > paragraph in section 7 addresses the issue that you've raised: > > Note that AXFR [RFC5936] and IXFR [RFC1995] have the property that > one query message might result in multiple response messages. > Therefore, those protocols have their own specific ordering > requirements. > > Look reasonable?
It does, but I suggest (as this is published after RFC5936 and RFC1995)
that the draft explicitly state that these messages corresponding to a
transfer are not reordered, and also whether they could be multiplexed
with other messages.
Mukund
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
