Hello, RFC 7344 left out the problems of deletion and addition because they were scary.
I think that the draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds document is quite clear about deleting DS records, and I think it makes sense. However, in the case of adding DS records, to me the document is less of a specification than a discussion about possible approaches to the difficult issue of when to accept the CDS RRset. This discussion is not necessarily a problem, because that's all we have today. The reasons that I questioned whether this draft should result in a standards-track document is because of the ambiguous and vague way that DNSSEC is enabled with CDS/CDNSKEY. I do think that RFC 7344 should be standards track. To be clear, I'm not strongly opposed to standards track, but I am not sure what it means to have a standards track document that doesn't actually tell me how to inter-operate or even really how to do anything concrete. (This might just be my IETF ignorance, I admit!) Cheers, -- Shane
pgpclQ32hR1YV.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
