Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > > RFC 4949 - Internet Security Glossary > > I looked there, but the terms don't fit well for DNSSEC. If there are bits > below that we can pick out, great, but it seems like a stretch.
Hmm, yes, much less useful than my vague memory suggested. And I'm not sure some of its recommended usage is actually sane, e.g. people talk about authenticated crypto (as in AES-CGM etc.) not verified crypto. It's probably worth explicitly describing how DNS usage differs from RFC 4949. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode North Fitzroy: Northerly 4 or 5, becoming variable 3 or 4. Slight or moderate. Fair. Good. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
