On 18 Aug 2016, at 11:29, Marek Vavruša wrote:

Or SRV.

I disagree that a user, when asking for a SRV record, doesn't know that it is likely that they would want the results for the information that comes back in the RDATA.

These are cases where authoritative/resolver adding
interesting records as additionals works better.
Authoritatives have been doing that with extra SOA/NS in authority for
a while (for positive answers), but now
resolvers can hardly use them if these records are not secure.

Security of additional data is important, but orthogonal to what can be asked for or pushed.

Regardless of which draft is going to be adopted,

This thread is not about "which draft", it is about what is needed.

--Paul Hoffman

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to