On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:04:25PM -0400, Bob Harold <rharo...@umich.edu> wrote a message of 68 lines which said:
> > I'd rather you keep it [positive answers] > > > > +1 > Keep the positive, rather than writing a separate RFC for that later. Why not but, in that case, this would send back the document for several weeks, since the text about positive answers in -02 was very limited and unclear (dropping it, like -03 did, is easier.) It is not just a matter of "keeping positive answers", it is a matter of "seriously studying the case of positive answers, which was neglected in the previous discussions". _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
