On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Jiankang Yao <ya...@cnnic.cn> wrote:
> > Hello, > > We have updated it to the new version, simplying the mechanism. > pls kindly help to review it. any comments are welcome. > If Seoul DNSOP meeting has some time slot for it, I will appreciate it. > > thanks a lot. > > Jiankang Yao > > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org > 抄送: > 主题: New Version Notification for draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying- > questions-01.txt > > > A new version of I-D, draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying-questions-01.txt > has been successfully submitted by Jiankang Yao and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying-questions > Revision: 01 > Title: A DNS Query including A Main Question with Accompanying > Questions > Document date: 2016-10-24 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 9 > URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-yao-dnsop- > accompanying-questions-01.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yao-dnsop- > accompanying-questions/ > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying- > questions-01 > Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-yao-dnsop- > accompanying-questions-01 > > Abstract: > This document enables DNS initiators to send a main question > accompanying with several related questions in a single DNS query, > and enables DNS responders to put the answers into a single DNS > response. This mechanism can reduce the number of DNS round-trips > per application work-unit. > > I like the concept. Removing the UAQ bit was a good change. The AQ bit and count are probably unnecessary, the option length will determine the end of the options. But I don't understand how the length of each prefix is determined. Can you explain? Some minor spelling corrections: section 4 ‘make’ -> ‘makes’ section 5 ‘accomanying’ -> ‘accompanying’ ‘quesiton’-> ‘question’ -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
