On 06/02/2017 16:55, Tony Finch wrote:
> Ray Bellis <r...@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, that's right, with the caveat that all existing locally served
>> zones are in the reverse space - there's no forward zones registered (yet).
>
> There are several :-) RFC 6761 specifies localhost, invalid, test as
> locally served zones. RFC 6762 specifies local. RFC 7686 specifies onion.
>
> RFC 7534 says that the AS112 DNAME target zones should be locally served,
> though they are not listed in the special use registry.
>
> The example domains are special use but not locally served.
The "locally served zones" and "special use domains" registries are
different. There is potentially scope for overlap.
It's possible that some special use domains might benefit from special
treatment in the root zone, too (".localhost" ?)
Ray
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
