On Feb 6, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Ólafur Gudmundsson <o...@ogud.com> wrote: > What RFC are you referring to?
I wasn't referring to an RFC—I was referring to the homenet naming architecture document that we've been working on. > Why do you think .ARPA is for services? > It's for infrastructure and homenet wants to join the infrastructure. What made you think I though that. What I mean is that it sounds like it's something global, not something local, because of the .arpa subdomain. > It is waste of time arguing if name A or B is better take the one you can get > faster. This is your opinion. I don't recall hearing you express it when I asked the working group which option they preferred. We have a substantial amount of time to waste; the working group decided to waste it. I don't see a problem with that. If we need to revisit this later, when it becomes a pressing issue, I think we have a pretty clear expedient solution, as you say, so there is no harm in trying for the solution that we want, and that we thing produces the better result for end users.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
