Tim, At 2017-03-16 03:16:50 -0400 tjw ietf <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We've had a lot of WG discussion on this, and it seems relevant to do a > formal call for adoption. If there are outstanding issues raised during > the CfA, time in Chicago will be set aside to have those discussions. > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for: > draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by > DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. While from a practical point of view this mostly only useful for ICANN, it is important to document this issue so that anyone who implements their own trust anchors understands it, and also so that future DNS people know that the issue was considered. I am in favor of adoption. Cheers, -- Shane
pgpTTqIZdTZqu.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
