Hello, On 28 Mar 2017, at 0:49, Dave Lawrence wrote:
Speaking of Ray's draft, our proposal is able to handle his use case but unfortunately our use cases are not achievable in his. I'd welcome joining up.
Please note that neither draft handles the use case of also passing the port number, which in a world of growing CGN deployment, may soon prove quite important.
Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
