Ray Bellis writes: > I'm somewhat philosophically opposed to anything that injects client > related information such that it's shared between different parties.
Understandable. I honestly have similar reservations. One thing that clouds this a little, as far as our draft is concerned, is that the ISP's CPE already knows this information so in a sense it isn't that a different party is being informed. What I'm trying to accomplish with this draft is acknowledge the practical realities that this sort of option is already in use on the Internet and will continue to be used no matter what the WG does about either of our drafts. I also wanted to drag the PII issues out into the open, into one place where they would have to be confronted by implementers and operators. I fear that a splintered effort on including full client-identifying information in several different ways is going to lead to problematic fragmentation and harder management. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
