Hi,
On 7/18/17 8:32 AM, Petr Špaček wrote:
I'm fine with Informational document describing the existing version of RPZ. My hope that working on that as WG item will help to improve the text so it is unambiguous. Improvements to the protocol can be done later on.
Thank you-- this is exactly the intent. Suzanne _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
