> -----Original Message----- > From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephane Bortzmeyer >
Hi Stéphane, Thanks again for your comments and encouragement. > > > The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state Candidate for > > WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski) > > > > The document is available at > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-woodworth-bulk-rr/ > > I've read it and, while I'm not convinced it can be implemented > properly (I would like to see running code), > We are working on this at the moment. > > I think there is a clear demand for that and that the solution > is reasonable. I therefore support its adoption. (Of course, > as always, it does not mean I will support the result at the end.) > Thanks. > > I'm still hesitant with the NPN feature. > Understood. > > I would like the draft to be modified to make clearer that it > is non-mandatory to support BULK. For instance, setcion 3's > "When an authoritative nameserver receives a query for which > it does not have a matching name or a covering wildcard, it > MUST then look for BULK RRs" > should be replaced by "When a *BULK-aware* authoritative > nameserver receives a query for which it does not have a > matching name or a covering wildcard, …" > > Section 3.2.3 "longer values MUST be truncated to the width" > Left-truncated or right-truncated? > I would like to have a discussion with you sometime about this. Thanks, John -- THESE ARE THE DROIDS TO WHOM I REFER: This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
