> > I'm not sure that the need for robustness outweighs the expectation of > someone explicitly adding a trust anchor anymore.
But that’s not your call to make, but the call of the entity deciding to put in that hard coded trust anchor. We just ask you not to block us from doing as we have been doing for years. > OTOH, in the sense "I am not sure" there's the example of split-DNS and poor > query path management (i.e., leaks). I'm not sure if robustness helps here, > or is a bad-behavior enabler. I would like split-DNS to die too but I dont think that’s happening soon. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
