On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 03:45:30PM +0000, Edward Lewis wrote:
> On 11/9/17, 12:48, "DNSOP on behalf of Evan Hunt" <dnsop-boun...@ietf.org on 
> behalf of e...@isc.org> wrote:
> 
> >    On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:48:26PM +0100, Petr Špaček wrote:
> >    > Nice write-up Edward! You have nicely summarized why Mark and me agree
> >    > that validator should use longest suffix match when selecting TA to
> >    > validate data.
> >    
> >    +1.
> 
> Hmmm, that wasn't my intent. ;)  I had been trying to justify the other 
> conclusion.  But, if my work is leading you towards this "other" conclusion, 
> I've been taking time to understand why.
> 
> I'm beginning to have a new understanding on this.  The overlooked (by me) 
> point is that we are focusing on a situation where the local operator has 
> chosen to explicitly configure a trust anchor.  Beside code distributions 
> shipping with the IANA managed KSK (or its DS form) for the global public 
> Internet's root zone, if any operator wants another trust anchor point, they 
> have to take explicit action to configure it.  The question is - what is the 
> expectation of the operator in doing this?
> 
> There was a time when TLDs were signed but the root zone was not.  Then 
> operators had to configure trust anchors for the TLDs to enable validation.  
> When the root zone was signed in 2010, the TLDs had to remind all those with 
> trust anchors to remove them (before the TLD could change it's KSK).  I can 
> no longer find reports of the efforts to undo TLD trust anchors (Sweden and 
> maybe CzechRep?) that I thought were once floating around.  "Fears" 
> surrounding this would lead one to favor the more open "any" policies, on the 
> other hand, mass migration from TLDs to root for the top of the trust chain 
> was probably a one-time event as a result of the on-set of DNSSEC in the root 
> zone.
> 

Yes. And add to that cases were TLDs rolled just before adding to the
root.

https://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter/2010-May/027981.html
https://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter/2010-June/028053.html
https://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter/2010-July/028138.html

Fred

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to