On 29 Nov 2017, at 7:06, Tony Finch wrote: > Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote: > >> But I shall not include a change to the definition of referrals such >> that upward referrals are defined away. They exist, today, all over the >> Internet, and it would be extremely foolish lexicography to attempt to >> hide that. > > Upward referrals exist, but bare "referral" is short for "downward > referral". Other things that look like referrals (such as upward > referrals or implicit referrals) have to have a qualifier.
Yes, please. This is good formulation for our definitional problems. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
