On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:26:42 +0000 "Darcy Kevin (FCA)" <kevin.da...@fcagroup.com> wrote:
> How about just "disjoint DNS" or "non-synchronized DNS"? Or, to > hijack the Perl motto, TMTOWTRI (There's More Than One Way To Resolve > It :-) Coming up with new names though is less than ideal. The Microsoft community has used split-brain, which might be an option, but might not get a lot of support from this community (including me). RFC 7719 seems to prefer the term "view" for better or worse. I kind like that. Paul's comment doesn't convince me it shouldn't be apportioned for this. John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
