On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:58:08PM +0000, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Yeah, that's a bit iffy. Homenet is another example of the same thing.
> I would make it more generic, something like this:
>
> Where DNS servers that are authoritative for a particular set of domains
> provide partly or completely different answers in those domains depending
> on the source of the query. The effect of this is that a domain name that
> is notionally globally unique nevertheless has different meanings for
> different network users.
This might be a little *too* generic: it appears to cover things like
geographically tailored responses and EDNS Client-Subnet, as well as
the internal and external views that are more typically what
"split[-horizon] DNS" refers to.
At a technical level there may not be much difference, but I've always
thought of "split DNS" as being specific to the boundary point between an
organizational intranet and the global internet. It's my impression that
historically most people who've used the term meant it in that sense, and
it might be confusing to broaden the definition retroactively.
I do think the text above is useful, though. I would suggest that, as there
are now several situations in which DNS responses may differ depending on
the client, would could define a generic term for that ("multi-horizon DNS"
or similar?), and then define "split DNS" as a specific case in which the
answer depends on whether the originating client is inside or outside of a
network controlled by the server's operator.
--
Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
