When Ed have up defending the qtuple, complexity moved in.
On March 20, 2018 4:04:31 PM UTC, Joao Damas <j...@bondis.org> wrote:
>Camels are indeed great animals and they can be loaded until eventually
>one more insignificant straw breaks their back. I guess that is were
>Bert thinks the DNS is at now and I don’t completely disagree
>
>Joao
>
>> On 20 Mar 2018, at 15:12, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr>
>wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 07:29:50AM +0000,
>> tjw ietf <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote
>> a message of 94 lines which said:
>>
>>> At the end of Tuesday's session we're having Bert Hubert from Power
>DNS
>>> give a talk on what he views "The Camel".
>>
>> Unlike the popular saying
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_by_committee#Aphorisms>, camels
>> are extraordinary animals, well adapted to their harsh environment
>>
><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camel#Ecological_and_behavioral_adaptations>
>> and usable for many things, even war
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camel_cavalry>. If the DNS is a camel,
>> this is great!
>>
>>> "In past years, DNS has been enhanced with DNSSEC, QName
>>> Minimization, [...]
>>
>> I dispute the idea that QNAME minimization is an addition. It is not
>a
>> change in the protocol, and it was even possible from the beginning
>> (Section 5.3.3 of [RFC1034] or Section 7.2 of [RFC1035] do NOT
>mandate
>> QNAME maximimization, it is just an accidental evolution).
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
>_______________________________________________
>DNSOP mailing list
>DNSOP@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
