| _spf | TXT | [RFC7208] | <-----
That's just a mistake. Take it out.
Apropos of John K's comment about per-type names, he's right. Given that
people can do whatever they want I have to agree that if people want to
define names that way, we can't prohibit them.
Assuming we agree that the table also says where to find the registry for
second level names, this removes and need for special cases. The top
level names _tcp _udp _sctp _dccp all work for SRV and URI and take
service names on the second level.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
