On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 04:43:53PM +0200, Pieter Lexis wrote: > Hi Matthijs, > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:31:57 +0200 > Matthijs Mekking <matth...@pletterpet.nl> wrote: > > > It's been a while, but I have put up a new version of the MIXFR draft: > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mekking-mixfr-02 > > The draft speaks of an OPCode in the IANA section and of a meta > RRType in the examples and Introduction section, which is it? > > If it is an RRType, some words need to be added about the fact that > current resolvers will pass through the MIXFR query and not reply with > NOTIMPL. In a similar vein, unaware auths will respond with an NXDOMAIN > or (more likely) a NODATA in that case.
Draft's samples use regular QUERY opcode and I suppose a new met RRType MIXFR. Does current auth server have any special processing for meta RRTypes? If not your are correct regarding the unaware server and this needs to be stated and handled by clients. Fred _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
