On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:11 AM, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > Darcy Kevin (FCA) <kevin.da...@fcagroup.com> wrote: > > > > Having said that, even RFC 1034 admits that the non-dot-terminated form > > “is often one where the trailing dot has been omitted to save typing”, > > so if the document wants to give a nod to how DNS names are typically > > represented in practice, that would also be fine, albeit slightly less > > pedantic. > > To be truly pedantic it should mention that some protocols (mail at least) > forbid a trailing dot :-) > > Tony. > -- > f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ > > And web browsers, in my experience.
-- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
