I have said before, but don't know if I still adhere to it, but anyways, here's a question: How *long* do people think a biassing mechanism like HE is a good idea?
* is it a good idea *forever* * or is it a transition path mechanism which has an end-of-life? * how do we know, when its at end-of-life? I used to love HE. I now have a sense, I'm more neutral. Maybe, we actually don't want modified, better happy eyeballs, because we want simpler, more deterministic network stack outcomes with less bias hooks? I barely register if I an on v4 any more. I assume I'm on 6 on many networks. This is as an end-user. I guess if I am really an end user, this belief I understand TCP and UDP is false, and I should stop worrying (as an end user) On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:49 PM Davey Song <songlinj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> But in the general case the network cannot. >> Think host multi-homing. > > > Yes or no. > > Generally speaking the races of IPv6 and IPv4 connections on both network and > client are going to be suffered by netowrk dynamics, including Multi-homing, > route flaps, roaming, or other network falilures. Extremely, a client can get > a better IPv6 connection in one second (when IPv6 win the race), and lose it > in next second. In such case, more sophisticated measurement should be > done(on client or network) , for a longer period, on statistics of RTT and > Failure rate, or combinations of them. But in IMHO, the assumption of HE is > relatively stable network for short exchange connections. The dynamics exits > but relatively rare or no notable impact on HE. So I see no such discussion > in RFC8035. > > Davey > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
