On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:33 PM Spencer Dawkins < spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This is absolutely a "plea for clue Discuss", after which I will > immediately > clear because the right thing will happen. > > There are three text blocks that follow this form: > > If a public specification that defines use of a "TXT" calls for the > use of an underscore-prefixed domain name, the global underscored > name -- the one closest to the root -- MUST be entered into this > registry, if it is not already registered. > > ->Here is a template of suggested text for this to appear in the IANA > ->Considerations section of the specification: > > "Per" [Attrleaf] "please add the following entry to the DNS > Underscore Global Scoped Entry Registry:" > > Do you have a really strong sense that this shouldn't be > > If a public specification that defines use of a "TXT" calls for the > use of an underscore-prefixed domain name, the global underscored > name -- the one closest to the root -- MUST be entered into this > registry, if it is not already registered, by adding this text to > the IANA Considerations section of the specification: > > "Per" [Attrleaf] "please add the following entry to the DNS > Underscore Global Scoped Entry Registry:" > > I may be overreacting to "MUST do something like this", which is roughly > what > I'm reading into "template of suggested text", and if I am, I'm almost sure > someone will tell me that ... but I'm not seeing an obvious reason to > REQUIRE > one of an unbounded set of flowers to bloom ;-) > Hi, I just arrived in Amsterdam, and am somewhat bleary, but I'm not sure I understand your question / point -- is it simply normalizing the IANA language? W > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
