On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 2:18 PM Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> On 10/11/2018 8:01 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > I just arrived in Amsterdam, and am somewhat bleary, but I'm not sure I > > understand your question / point -- is it simply normalizing the IANA > > language? > > > Offlist he explained to me that the main concern was a normative > requirement, without the specification detail to be sure to satisfy it. > > The issue was rendered moot by the removal of the normative language > from that draft. > Ah, thank you. I’d like to apologize for being distracted / not as involved in the balloting as I usually am; my travels and the upcoming KSK Roll have both been taking lots of my focus. W > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
