fujiw...@jprs.co.jp <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> wrote: > DNS with TCP transport is enough, I think.
Yes, and I think there's a slightly deeper argument here. The DNS is suffering from relatively poor transport protocol engineering. Fragmentation and pMTUd woes are one aspect of it; bad tuning of timeouts is another; and security, and privacy, etc. Rather than wedging transport features into the DNS, a better strategy is to use off-the-shelf transport layers, which have much greater investment in expertise and engineering. I'm looking forward to QUIC. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Biscay: Cyclonic becoming southwesterly, 6 to gale 8, occasionally severe gale 9 at first in south. Rough or very rough, occasionally moderate. Rain or thundery showers. Good, occasionally poor. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
