On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 23:03, Wes Hardaker <wjh...@hardakers.net> wrote:
> Ray Bellis <r...@isc.org> writes: > > > This new draft describes a way for clients and servers to exchange a > > limited amount of information where the semantics of that information > > are completely unspecified, and therefore determined by bi-lateral > > agreement between the client and server operators. > 8< What happens when the upstream software changes? Or the upstream server > is taken over by a new company that deploys entirely new semantics? How > is that change communicated to all the clients? What if the new bits > mean something entirely different, potentially the exact opposite? How > are conflicts like this handled? > The conflict never arises. As the man said, "[semantics are] determined by bi-lateral agreement". If the counter-party decides to do something different, it has repudiated the agreement. --Dick
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
