On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 08:13, Ray Bellis <r...@bellis.me.uk> wrote: > > > On 04/03/2019 23:03, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > > Hmmm.. very interesting idea, but I'm having a hard time seeing how > > this will be used in the real world in a scalable and interoperable > > way. > > The use cases on the open internet are probably less interesting than > those were client and server have a more tightly coupled relationship. >
+1 > I suggest that I add a sentence or two about applicability, constraining > it to those where the client has tight coupling (be that topologically > or contractually) to a particular set of servers. > The present wording already provides the necessary constraint; being exclusively between the [exactly two] parties to the agreement. What is there to not understand about the term "bi-lateral agreement". --Dick
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
