> On 21 Mar 2019, at 22:29, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jacques Latour <jacques.lat...@cira..ca> >> wrote: >> Plus! >> Is anyone looking at adding DoH and DoT servers as part of DHCP/SLAAC? So >> the local resolver and apps and browsers can go the _appropriate_ name >> resolution resource(s) using the protocol of choice. That would be much >> simpler for default configuration in enterprise and ISP. > > I think that is a good starting place for the side meeting discussion.
Nope. It could be a topic for *another* side meeting. But not the one that’s under consideration here. That side discussion is supposed to be about the contents of draft-reid-doh-operator, draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues and maybe draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients. And what to do about those drafts. I’m not so sure a side meeting on DHCP/SLAAC for DoT/DoH discovery is needed -- at least, not yet -- because there is a live discovery draft and work item already in progress in the DoH WG. That would seem to be the most appropriate place to first raise those issues. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
