Brian Dickson writes: > Have any "closed system" implementations of non-standard apex-CNAME > hacks, committed publicly to neutral ANAME operations, presuming > ANAME as currently envisioned? I.e. If each such provider will > ONLY support ANAME with targets on their own infrastructure, I don't > think the standardization effort will have any real value.
I have a related question ... is allowing only targets on their own infrastructure currently a limitation most such providers have? I can't speak to Akamai's plans for implementing ANAME, but can say that one of their apex-CNAME features allows any name to be used as a target. Their other feature allows only a subset of names on their platform to be a target but that's an efficiency issue, not a policy one, and I would expect their handling of ANAME to use that method when appropriate or fall back to the general case otherwise. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
