On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:00 PM John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > In article <064ba295-f3dd-46e4-86a9-e03cf68eb...@sinodun.com> you write: > >-=-=-=-=-=- > > > >Hi, > > > >In the spirit of deprecating things I have submitted a draft to deprecate > the status opcode. > > RFC 1034 says it's "To be defined" so this seems a little premature. > > Other than that, go for it. > > Does this increase or decrease the 'camel' page count?
-- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
