> On 16 May 2019, at 12:23, Petr Špaček <petr.spa...@nic.cz> wrote: > Personally I think it is not worth the effort, it will just add one more > RFC to read and does not help the protocol maintenance. > > I would say that it is better to have one "cleanup" RFC instead of > one-off doc with one useful paragraph in it. With one bigger document we > could say to newcommers "this is list of things you can ignore when you > encounter them in pile of DNS RFCs”.
Agree. Also “obsolete” in a document often leads to the pursue of whatever obsoleted it and it is not always clear. A cleanup doc, ala “clarifications” would be a better approach Joao _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
