On 8/1/19 6:08 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
I'm in favor of adoption. I'm not sure if it's a good idea to suggest content changes in this same thread already, but I suppose adoption itself will be easy to get consensus about. RDoT: I believe the wording should not exclude forwarding between two resolvers (when neither is really a stub). That seems actually a relatively common use case for DoT. --Vladimir _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
