On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 3:20 PM Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote:
> > Anybody who was currently harbouring plans to apply for ALT in some future > round of new gTLD applications would therefore presumably feel harmed by a > decision to make it impossible for those plans to be executed. > That is a very clear explanation. Thank you. I think a more salient issue might be that URI schemes can imply default ports and name resolution mechanisms. As applications (imho, rightly) begin to hide URI schemes, inventing new name resolution mechanisms will become easier to do. I think having a global namespace is extremely valuable, but I can see ways in which short-sighted DNS arguments could result in fragmentation at the scheme level. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
