On Nov 26, 2019, at 12:52 PM, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > It might be worth clarifying what the actual scope of this proposal is. I > think that the idea is to say “look, if you want to use a private name, these > names are known to be safe.” It’s not to say “the IETF hereby declares that > the following names are safe,” but rather “the IETF is reporting that these > names have been declared safe by this other SDO.” > > The point of making this recommendation is that we know that people will have > reasons to privately use domains that have not been allocated to them out of > the global namespace, and we’ve seen the problems that such private > allocations cause when they are done in an unsafe manner. The advice here is > on how to avoid making that mistake. It’s not a TLD allocation by IETF: > those TLDs are already effectively allocated. > > Is that about right?
Exactly (at least from my perspective). Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
