On Nov 26, 2019, at 9:16 AM, Matthew Pounsett <m...@conundrum.com> wrote: > I'm also persuaded by Bill's argument that the IETF has already stated that > ISO 3166 has control over that bit of the namespace, and trying to take back > part of it is confusing, bad form, and risky.
For those who read the draft, ypu'll see that "trying to take back part of it" is not there. The same was made clear in the presentation to the WG. "If you want a private name, here's one to consider; ones like it are already being used as private names in dozens of other contexts" is far from "taking" anything. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
