On 20/12/2019 15:08, Bob Harold wrote:
> But if we are updating it, could we consider a better word than > "forward" ? Actually "backward" would be correct, although I prefer > "from the back to the front" as used elsewhere. It's not possible to traverse the RRs in a raw DNS packet "backwards". You have to start at the beginning and remember the offset of each RR found. Ray
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
