+1 on "Complete" Tim (no hats this time)
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:01 PM Ray Bellis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 20/12/2019 15:08, Bob Harold wrote: > > > But if we are updating it, could we consider a better word than > > "forward" ? Actually "backward" would be correct, although I prefer > > "from the back to the front" as used elsewhere. > > It's not possible to traverse the RRs in a raw DNS packet "backwards". > You have to start at the beginning and remember the offset of each RR > found. > > Ray > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
