On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 4:59 PM Shumon Huque <shu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 12:51 PM Bob Harold <rharo...@umich.edu> wrote: > >> Having read through the draft, and twice through the emails, I think the >> draft has the right balance in using the parent and child NS RRsets >> properly. >> >> I think the "extra" query for the child NS, sent once per parent TTL, is >> a savings over the older method of sending the NS records as "additional >> data" in every response. >> >>> >>> > Thank you Bob. I just want to qualify your last observation a bit - the > extra query would be once per minimum of parent and child TTL, roughly. > > Shumon. > Ah, yes, thanks for the correction. -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
