On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 18:12, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2020, at 9:26 AM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > > What's your reasoning for why there needs to be community review before > there is a code point assigned? > > Historically, the quality of algorithm descriptions in early drafts has > been variable. What the author considers sufficient and obvious, another > might not. Also, review gives folks a chance to say things like "your test > vectors appear wrong", "having test vectors would be really useful", and so > on. > How does any of that apply? The algorithm in this case is specified by another standards organisation and is what it is. Community review did not find the incorrect test parameters in RFC5832 / GOST R34.10-2001. --Dick Franks > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
